Canadian ISPs & Consumer Complaints

Early last month, Michael Geist, a Canadian law professor, published a list of consumer complaints filed against Canadian ISPs with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CTRC), the regulatory body whose mandate is “to ensure that both the broadcasting and telecommunications systems serve the Canadian public.”

The CRTC does not publicly disclosed details on net neutrality complaints and investigations, but Geist filed an Access to Information request to gain access to the information, dating back to late 2009. The documents showed that virtually all major Canadian ISPs have been the target of complaints. Despite this, the CRTC has only acted to enforce regulations in a fraction of the complaints brought before them.

Looking at the graphs, two things immediately become apparent: there are a huge number of net neutrality complaints (nearly 60% of all registered complaints) and the CRTC doesn’t seems too keen on flexing its regulatory muscle. The CRTC only stepped in to enforce regulations three times – less than 10% of all cases brought before it.

Mouse over the graphs for more detail. The table below contains all the documentation posted on Geist’s site. The table can be filtered by keyword or you can sort it by clicking on the table header.

Much thanks to Michael Geist for his tireless efforts keeping Canada’s Internet open!

Complaints Registered with the CRTC 2009-2011

Filter:


ISP Date CRTC Number Complaint Resolution
Rogers February 2011 514192 Throttling of World of Warcraft online game. Leads to regular disconnection. Denied. Rogers says throttling practices have no effect on online gaming (later reverse)
Rogers May 2011 534293 Degrading Skype, Net2Phone Ongoing
Bell December 2009 475593 Bell throttling access to MediaMonkey.com Denied. CRTC says Bell’s disclosure page does not reference site, so problem may lie with the site itself.
Bell May 2011 526400 Throttling applications even when no network congestion. (TekSavvy is also named in the complaint.) Denied. Burden on the complainant to provide evidence. No evidence provided of specific apps or length of time affected.
Barrett Xplore January 2010 8646-C12-2008154000 ExaTEL complains Barrett Xplore throttling renders Internet telephony unusable, creating an unfair advantage for its own voice telephone service. Traffic management policies not fully disclosed. CRTC rules not an undue preference since Barrett Xplore runs voice traffic on a separate circuit. Further rules that throttling violates rules for degrating time sensitive traffic and requires change to policy or application for CRTC approval. Barrett Xplore changes traffic management approach. CRTC also rules that dislosure insufficient. Barrett Xplore non-responsive until May 2011, when CRTC threatens to take the issue to a public proceeding.
Rogers March 2010 486625 Throttling affecting corporate VPN connection Rogers policy says it does not affect VPN. Contact Rogers. If unsatisfied and you have evidence of rule violation, provide evidence for further consideration.
Cogeco March 2010 482415 Traffic management policy involves throttling 24/7 Denied. CRTC asks complainant for more evidence of policy and harm.
Bell July 2010 496316 Traffic management policy overbroad Denied.
Rogers March 2011 522253 Throttling of World of Warcraft online game. Leads to regular disconnection. Admits problem and promises to fix.
Bruce Street Technologies July 2010 496016 Throttling traffic without disclosure. Admits throttling for brief period without disclosure. Subsequently dropped throttling practices.
Rogers August 2010 496562 Claim throttling speeds on xBox usage Rogers denies the claim.
Wind Mobile August 2010 496185 Speed slowed after 5 GB of usage on all Internet traffic. Lack of disclosure on Fair Use Policy. CRTC says slowing usage of any time sensitive traffic would be a violation of ITMP rules or require CRTC approval. Says disclosure inadequate.
Wind Mobile September 2010 494833 Port blocking restricts some uses and not properly disclosed. CRTC says disclosure inadequate. Agrees to amend disclosure page.
Rogers February 2011 505052 Disclosure of throttling practices inadequate as effect of upload throttling not fully discussed Agrees to amend disclosure page
Telco Quadro Communications October 2010 502906 Change in traffic management practices. Denied. Practices ruled consistent with net neutrality guidelines.
Bell November 2010 504432 Throttling speeds for downloads from hotfile.com Admits error. Deep packet inspection technology mistakenly treating downloads as peer-to-peer traffic.  Promises to fix, but denies any violation of CRTC rules.
Barrett Xplore February 2011 512810 Traffic management dramatic effect on services. Denied. No evidence of violation.
Rogers February 2011 514192 Throttling renders service useless. Denied. Company provides disclosure and no evidence of non-compliant policies.
Shaw December 2009 475351 Blocking Skype users from accessing BC numbers. Require Shaw account information before proceeding.
Barrett Xplore June 2010 494139 Bad service with slow speeds Outside the scope of ITMP policy.
Rogers July 2010 494836 Problems with SIP (session initiation protocol) on Port 5060. Admits problem but argues it is not a traffic management issue.
Rogers February 2011 503207 Disclosure of throttling practices inadequate as effect of upload throttling not fully discussed Agrees to amend disclosure page
Rogers December 2010 505777 Rogers customer service providing conflicting information about throttling practices Acknowledges incorrect information provided by one representative.
Uniserve January 2011 510718 Traffic shaping hurts some applications. Flash video very slow. Agrees to amend disclosure page.
Rogers February 2011 510987 Disclosure of throttling practices inadequate as effect of upload throttling not fully discussed Agrees to amend disclosure page
Rogers February 2011 511366 Disclosure of throttling practices inadequate as effect of upload throttling not fully discussed Agrees to amend disclosure page
Rogers April 2011 517209 Throttling of World of Warcraft online game. Leads to regular disconnection. Admits problem and promises to fix.
Rogers March 2011 517209 Throttling of World of Warcraft online game. Leads to regular disconnection. Admits problem and promises to fix.  “Problem is not due to a Rogers’ policy but rather due to a software problem which we will fix as soon as possible”
Telus March 2011 527577 General throttling concerns. Telus works with customer to address speed problems.
Videotron May 2011 528197 Calculation of bandwidth usage. Monthly usage not charged fairly. Denied. No regulation of retail services. Referred to CCTS.
Bell March 2011 529146 Limiting HTTP upload rates and limiting upload on port 55145. Unknown
Rogers March 2011 529411 Advertising of Speed Boost inconsistent with World of Warcraft throttling. Denied. Marketing outside of policy. No evidence of violation provided.
Rogers May 2011 529619 Throttling of peer-to-peer applications. Denied. Rogers discloses this practice.
Rogers April 2011 530230 Throttling of World of Warcraft online game. Leads to regular disconnection. Admits problem and promises to fix.
Shaw May 2011 533015 Inability to see monthly Internet usage Shaw deactivated feature when it dropped usage based billing.
Shaw June 2011 538009 Intercepting failed domain name requests and redirecting to company pages Ongoing

Source: michaelgeist.ca